AI Summary

Generated 0 seconds ago

Case Overview

The case of NANA OTUO ANTWI BOASIAKO VS NANA ADJEI PANIN revolves around a boundary dispute between the Abonu and Deduako stools in the Ashanti region, which originated in 1927 and was revisited in 2007. The dispute centers on the ownership of a piece of land and the determination of the boundary between the two stools.

Area of Law

This case falls under the area of Land Law, specifically boundary disputes and the determination of stool land boundaries.

Key Legal Issue

The central question addressed by the court was the determination of the boundary between the Abonu and Deduako stools, and which party had trespassed on the other's land.

Legal Principles Applied

The key legal principles applied in this case include the principle of res judicata, the role of possession in determining trespass, and the importance of survey evidence in boundary disputes.

The Ruling

The court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, determining that the defendant had trespassed on the plaintiff's land and awarding damages for trespass.

Significance

This case is significant for legal practitioners as it highlights the importance of careful consideration of historical evidence and survey reports in determining boundary disputes, and the need to apply legal principles such as res judicata and the role of possession in determining trespass.

Judgment/Court Decision

NANA OTUO ANTWI BOASIAKO VS NANA ADJEI PANIN

J4/41/2021 Supreme Court 2023

Presiding Justice

DOTSE JSC

Date of Judgment

18th January 2023

Neutral Citation

[2023] SUPREMECOURT 50

Coram

DOTSE JSC (Presiding) AMEGATCHER JSC TORKORNOO (MRS.) JSC PROF. MENSA-BONSU (MRS.) JSC KULENDI JSC

Parties

Plaintiff/Appellant

NANA OTUO ANTWI BOASIAKO

Defendant/Respondent

NANA ADJEI PANIN

Full Judgment

Sign in to view full document

The full text of this document is available to registered members. Join our community of legal professionals today.

Tags

Supreme Court