The Unique Law Access
Generated 0 seconds ago
The case of NANA OTUO ANTWI BOASIAKO VS NANA ADJEI PANIN revolves around a boundary dispute between the Abonu and Deduako stools in the Ashanti region, which originated in 1927 and was revisited in 2007. The dispute centers on the ownership of a piece of land and the determination of the boundary between the two stools.
This case falls under the area of Land Law, specifically boundary disputes and the determination of stool land boundaries.
The central question addressed by the court was the determination of the boundary between the Abonu and Deduako stools, and which party had trespassed on the other's land.
The key legal principles applied in this case include the principle of res judicata, the role of possession in determining trespass, and the importance of survey evidence in boundary disputes.
The court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, determining that the defendant had trespassed on the plaintiff's land and awarding damages for trespass.
This case is significant for legal practitioners as it highlights the importance of careful consideration of historical evidence and survey reports in determining boundary disputes, and the need to apply legal principles such as res judicata and the role of possession in determining trespass.
Presiding Justice
DOTSE JSC
Date of Judgment
18th January 2023
Neutral Citation
[2023] SUPREMECOURT 50
Plaintiff/Appellant
NANA OTUO ANTWI BOASIAKO
Defendant/Respondent
NANA ADJEI PANIN
The full text of this document is available to registered members. Join our community of legal professionals today.